NEW PROVISIONS IN CANADA'S BUILDING CODE 2020 FOR 'NO STRUCTURAL DAMAGE' EARTHQUAKE PERFORMANCE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The latest version of the National Building Code of Canada, the 2020 edition, was released in early 2022. New provisions were added in the ˜Earthquake Loads and Effects' portion of the code, regarding additional performance requirements for Post-Disaster buildings, High Importance category buildings, and a subset of Normal Importance category buildings. Prior to NBC 2020 (in the NBC 2015) all buildings were to be designed for only one earthquake level, based on a 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years. The performance objective for Normal Importance buildings is to ˜minimize loss of life' (i.e., life safety) with the understanding that there could be extensive damage. The use of importance factors and reduced drift limits for High Importance and Post-Disaster buildings is to address performance objectives of ˜immediate occupancy' and being 'functional', respectively. These requirements remain in NBC 2020 for the noted earthquake level. The new provisions in NBC 2020 provide design requirement for other earthquake levels. The provisions require Post-Disaster buildings and High Importance buildings in defined hazard areas to ˜behave elastically' with a performance objective of ˜no structural damage' for earthquake demands based on a 5% probability of exceedance in 50 years and 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years, respectively. Reduced drift limits and additional requirements for connections of non-structural components are also specified. The new provisions require Normal Importance buildings more than 30-m high in defined hazard areas to have structural framing elements not considered to be part of the Seismic Force Resisting System to 'behave elastically' with a performance objective of ˜no structural damage' for earthquake demands based on a 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years. This paper provides further details about the new provisions and provides some information on the building cost impact of these new provisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".