MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115722651 · doi:10.71846/18-wcee-1668

METIS PROJECT: GEM'S CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HAZARD WORK PACKAGE

2025· article· en· W7115722651 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Conference of Earthquake Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)HazardProcess (computing)Latin hypercube samplingUncertainty quantificationMonte Carlo methodConvolution (computer science)Metis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this contribution, we illustrate improvements made to the OpenQuake Engine - the open-source hazard and risk calculation engine developed by GEM - by the GEM hazard team in the context of the METIS project. These include new approaches for the propagation of epistemic uncertainties, a new approach for the calculation of Vector-valued PSHA, the implementation of the Method 4 proposed by Lin et al. [2013] and the ability to compute seismic hazard by taking into account the contribution of aftershocks. Regarding the propagation of epistemic uncertainties, we improved the capabilities of the OQ Engine to process logic trees by adding the option of using a Latin Hypercube sampling approach in lieu of the more traditional Monte Carlo one and we included the possibility of specifying where to apply the weights assigned to the various realizations admitted. We also proposed a new way to propagate epistemic uncertainties that calculates seismic hazard for each individual source and combines the results in a post-processing phase by using discrete distributions and a convolution approach. This new method is computationally efficient and it provides results consistent with the ones provided by more traditional approaches. With respect to the calculation of the Conditional Spectrum, we implemented in the OQ Engine the most complete, rigorous and complex approach available for the calculation of the spectrum, the so-called method 4 from Lin et al. [2013]. We also developed a new approach for the calculation of VPSHA that combines the logic used by the so-called ‘indirect’ approach with a higher precision of the results computed. The last topic considered is modelling seismic hazard by considering aftershocks’ contributions. In this case, we implemented tools for adjusting the rates of existing main shocks based on input models for the OQ Engine to account for the contribution of aftershocks. We added to the OQ Engine functions allowing the computation of hazard using these models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Conference of Earthquake EngineeringSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207