MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115724443 · doi:10.71846/18-wcee-2984

THE NGA-SUBDUCTION WEB PORTAL FOR THE DATABASES, PROCESSED TIME SERIES, AND TOOLS

2025· article· en· W7115724443 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Conference of Earthquake Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataSubductionTable (database)Seismic hazardInterface (matter)HazardTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The NGA-Subduction Project (NGA-Sub) is the latest program in a series of Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) projects directed towards database and ground-motion model (GMM) development for seismic hazard analysis. Whereas prior projects had targeted shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions (NGA-West1 and NGA-West2) and stable continental regions (NGA-East), NGA-Sub is to address ground motions specifically in subduction zones. Subduction zone earthquakes are a dominant source of seismic hazard in many regions globally, including the Pacific Northwest region of the United States and Canada. The GMMs are based on processed recordings and supporting source, path, and site metadata from seven regions: Alaska, Cascadia, Central America and Mexico, Japan, New Zealand, South America, and Taiwan. The NGA-Sub program has published a variety of products for use in both education, research, and engineering practice. These products consist of: (a) a structured relational database of earthquake-source data, recording-station and site data, and path data, as well as intensity measures such as pseudo spectral accelerations, duration metrics and CAV; (b) a “flatfile”, which is a single table that combines all relevant data and metadata used for ground motion model development; (c) GMMs which provide estimates of the mean and standard deviation of spectral ordinates; (d) coded versions of the GMMs in python, matlab, R, and VB Excel -- the Excel file contains a user-friendly interface for input and output; (e) a dataset of interactive maps for all PSA intensity measures; and (f) a web portal for ground-motion record selection and download. The focus of this paper is on the web portal of the databases and processed time series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2160.233

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Conference of Earthquake EngineeringSame topicSeismic Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207