MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115724443 · doi:10.71846/18-wcee-2984

THE NGA-SUBDUCTION WEB PORTAL FOR THE DATABASES, PROCESSED TIME SERIES, AND TOOLS

2025· article· en· W7115724443 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Conference of Earthquake Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataSubductionTable (database)Seismic hazardInterface (matter)HazardTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The NGA-Subduction Project (NGA-Sub) is the latest program in a series of Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) projects directed towards database and ground-motion model (GMM) development for seismic hazard analysis. Whereas prior projects had targeted shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions (NGA-West1 and NGA-West2) and stable continental regions (NGA-East), NGA-Sub is to address ground motions specifically in subduction zones. Subduction zone earthquakes are a dominant source of seismic hazard in many regions globally, including the Pacific Northwest region of the United States and Canada. The GMMs are based on processed recordings and supporting source, path, and site metadata from seven regions: Alaska, Cascadia, Central America and Mexico, Japan, New Zealand, South America, and Taiwan. The NGA-Sub program has published a variety of products for use in both education, research, and engineering practice. These products consist of: (a) a structured relational database of earthquake-source data, recording-station and site data, and path data, as well as intensity measures such as pseudo spectral accelerations, duration metrics and CAV; (b) a “flatfile”, which is a single table that combines all relevant data and metadata used for ground motion model development; (c) GMMs which provide estimates of the mean and standard deviation of spectral ordinates; (d) coded versions of the GMMs in python, matlab, R, and VB Excel -- the Excel file contains a user-friendly interface for input and output; (e) a dataset of interactive maps for all PSA intensity measures; and (f) a web portal for ground-motion record selection and download. The focus of this paper is on the web portal of the databases and processed time series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it