MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115732900 · doi:10.71846/18-wcee-2381

SEISMIC DESIGN OF IRREGULAR BUILDINGS: NONLINEAR ANALYSIS AND CASE STUDY OF 1568 ALBERNI, VANCOUVER.

2025· article· en· W7115732900 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Conference of Earthquake Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismic analysisDeflection (physics)Induced seismicityNonlinear systemIncremental Dynamic AnalysisResidualEarthquake simulationSeismic loading

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear Response History Analysis (NLRHA) is an effective method to capture seismic response of high-rise structures with irregular gravity systems. This paper discusses the application of NLRHA for the design and analysis of a 43- story irregular high-rise reinforced concrete building located in BC, Canada, where seismic and wind demands are high. The lateral force resisting system (LFRS) consists of two centrally located reinforced concrete C-shape walls coupled with Steel Reinforced Concrete (SRC) coupling beams. Post-tensioned diaphragms connect the core to sloping columns that provide a curvy shape to the façade as the floor plate varies at each floor. The unique geometry of the building poses significant challenges for service seismic, service wind as well as design seismic and wind load cases. The magnitude of Gravity-Induced Lateral Demand Irregularity (GILD) is much higher than the limit prescribed by the National Building Code of Canada (NBC) near mid-height of the building. To reduce leaning deflection of the building under GILD, residual deflection under the design seismic load, and cracking in the core under service seismic and wind events, the core was reinforced with vertical post-tensioned tendons. A suite of 11 ground motions with and without vertical ground shaking components were selected and scaled to the target spectrum. The suite of ground motions includes crustal, subcrustal, and subduction ground motions that are consistent with the seismicity of Southwest BC. The NLRHA was carried out in CSI PERFORM-3D. The NLRHA results were compared with acceptance criteria set in PEER TBI II in order to meet target reliability thresholds specified in NBCC 2020 and ASCE 7-22. In addition, all diaphragms were modeled in VecTor 2 to accurately estimate their in-plane deformation under GILD demands. Finally, a staged construction analysis was carried out in CSI ETABS to estimate the long-term deflection of the building under GILD

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Conference of Earthquake EngineeringSame topicSeismic Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207