MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7115733272 · doi:10.11575/prism/50816

Microbial diversity and antimicrobial resistance from air and manure of layer chicken barns

2025· other· en· W7115733272 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistomeMetagenomicsManureAntibiotic resistanceMicrobiomeFirmicutesBacterial phylaMicrobial population biologyAntimicrobial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poultry housing environment has vast variety of microbial communities and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), which can be a serious public health concern in addition to their impact on the health of birds. Previous studies conducted elsewhere have demonstrated the metagenomic insights of resistome in poultry farm dust and ARGs against multiple antibiotics were predominantly recorded. Poultry litter and manure are spread in agriculture fields as fertilizer, which may pose a risk to environment and human and animal health. The thesis work was aimed at investigating the microbiome and resistome in air and manure of layer chicken barns across Alberta. Additionally, the host tracking of ARGs and the phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance profiling of non aureus Staphylococcus species (NASS) were conducted. The sampling was carried out in 15 (cage and floor housed layer chicken) barns across Alberta during 2022-24 and processed the samples by shotgun metagenomics for microbiome and resistome characterization, and whole genome sequencing of isolated bacterial colonies (NASS). Bacillota, Actinomycetota and Pseudomonadota were most relatively abundant phyla in study samples. Analysis of ARGs indicated that resistance was mainly for tetracyclines, aminoglycosides and lacosamide classes of antibiotics. A total of 113 unique ARG subtypes from 19 classes of antimicrobials were identified in air, while 166 unique ARG subtypes were discovered in manure samples. A total of 251 high quality MAGs were extracted from sequences including 249 bacterial and 2 archaeal genomes. Interestingly, 22 bacterial MAGs were not classified to species levels and were potentially the unique and novel taxa. ARGs were mainly harbored by Staphylococcus, Alistepes, Romboutsia, and Enterococcus species. Seven Staphylococcus equorum, 5 Staphylococcus shinii, 1 Staphylococcus pseudoxylosus, 1 Staphylococcus cohnii, and 1 Staphylococcus gallinarum isolates were confirmed and identified by WGS and comparative genomic analysis. This study provides a strong argument for the need for policy change regarding treatment of litter and manure prior to application on agriculture land in Alberta. Presence of potential opportunistic and pathogenic microorganisms and ARGs in poultry barn bioaerosols and litter can be a serious One Health concern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→