MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115755778 · doi:10.71846/18-wcee-1658

MESO SCALE OUT OF PLANE SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF A MASONRY CHURCH FAÇADE IN MONTRÉAL, QUÉBEC (CANADA)

2025· article· en· W7115755778 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Conference of Earthquake Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMasonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMasonryUnreinforced masonry buildingFeature (linguistics)Scale (ratio)Seismic zoneSeismic analysisCultural heritage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eastern Canada’s places of worship are vital resources of cultural heritage value, as well as centres of spirituality and social services. In Québec, these buildings date back to centuries ago and are considered critical touristic attractions in North America. Of particular interest from an earthquake engineering perspective are the grandiose Catholic churches built between the 18th and 19th centuries in Montréal, where the odds for a strong moment magnitude seismic event (>M6) are projected to be at least 5-15% in the next 50 years. Such buildings were constructed using traditional techniques imported by the first European settlers and later adapted to the local climate and material availability. Unreinforced masonry (URM) veneers or loadbearing walls, stone shallow foundations, early reinforced concrete (RC), or cast-iron frames were often used in combination with timber diaphragms, creating unique yet under-researched designs that did not feature any seismic detailing. Research ongoing at McGill University is among the first studies seeking to characterize key materials and components of typical old churches in Montréal, with the objective of providing information for their seismic assessment and potential preventive retrofit. In this paper, preliminary results from our first case-study are presented that focus on the church of Saint-Clement (1899), characterized by the simultaneous presence of long-span arches, stone masonry façades, steel/RC components and flexible floors. First, data from archival research and onsite inspections are presented, including architectural evolution and 3D laser scanning. Following, a pragmatic meso-scale analysis of the façade macro-element is proposed using a discontinuum (Distinct Element Method, DEM) computational approach. Preliminary results obtained by non-linear quasi-static analyses enabled us to identify types of out-of-plane failure modes and expected seismic capacities for different types of connections that the façade may have with the walls and the roof, something not available in previous literature in Canada and on which to base future research and tailored retrofit interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Conference of Earthquake EngineeringSame topicMasonry and Concrete Structural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207