MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7115811282

EXAMINING EVACUATION FOR BIRTH & CARE FOR FIRST NATIONS IN ONTARIO

2024· dissertation· en· W7115811282 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelocationReferralHealth careIndigenousReflexivityThematic analysisEthnographyDeveloping country
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: First Nations peoples are subjected to evacuation birth policy, through the First Nation Inuit Health Branch (FNIHB), whereby federally employed nursing personnel at FNIHB nursing stations arrange transport at 36 weeks’ gestation or sooner, resulting in the relocation of birth outside of their communities. Objectives: 1) Describe where First Nations peoples are being evacuated within the province of Ontario based on referral patterns. 2) Describe the influence of the dominant western culture within the federal and Ontario healthcare systems related to the provision of perinatal care provided to First Nations peoples who are evacuated out of their communities to give birth. Methods: Guided by focused ethnography and anti-oppression theory, I collected documentary data from FNIHB about evacuation for birth, as well as survey and interview data from 15 perinatal care providers working within the province of Ontario who have cared for evacuees. Results: Utilizing reflexive thematic analysis, I outlined overarching referral patterns established through institutional agreements that dictate where evacuees are sent for birth. I explain different facets of structural oppression present in perinatal care culture and its influence of provision of care, including lack of continuity of care; hyper-medicalization of care; centering of whiteness in policy and practice, and; a lack of knowledge about First Nations health and culture amongst providers. I share anti-oppressive practices implemented by care providers, health organizations, and systems which supported the return of birth back to First Nations communities. Discussion: Ending mandatory evacuation for birth is dependent on the growth of Indigenous midwifery in communities where evacuation for birth policy is implemented. I call upon and provide recommendations to health systems to redress structural oppression by uplifting Indigenous midwifery and creating anti-oppressive perinatal care cultures across Turtle Island.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→