MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115812649

Соціальний діалог замість конфлікту: зарубіжний досвід ефективного врегулювання трудових відносин

2025· article· uk· W7115812649 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLabor Market and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial dialogueTransparency (behavior)Context (archaeology)Balance of interestsInequalitySocial inequalityCollective bargainingSocial partnersField (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article examines modern approaches to the development of social dialogue as a key instrument for ensuring a balance of interests between the state, employers, and employees in the context of labor market transformation. The international experience of Canada and Spain is analyzed, demonstrating different models of applying social dialogue to regulate labor relations and address socio-economic challenges. It has been established that the Canadian project Equi’Vision ensured the practical implementation of the principle of equal pay for work of equal value, contributed to enhancing transparency in remuneration, and helped identify discriminatory factors in the labor market. It is emphasized that this project laid the foundation for introducing a system of monitoring gender equality in the field of labor. It has been proven that active cooperation among the state, trade unions, and employers within the framework of social dialogue can effectively promote the elimination of inequality and strengthen trust among social partners. It has been found that the Spanish experience, represented by the so-called “Riders’ Law,” confirmed the capacity of social dialogue to influence the formation of national labor legislation, taking into account the challenges of the digital economy. As a result of tripartite negotiations, the employment dependence of platform delivery couriers was recognized, providing them with access to social protections and collective bargaining rights. It has been demonstrated that social dialogue is capable not only of responding to change but also of shaping institutional conditions for the adaptation of the labor market to digital transformations. It has been substantiated that for Ukraine, under martial law, structural economic transformation, and labor market digitalization, these models have practical significance. It is proposed to apply the Canadian experience to enhance transparency in remuneration and implement analytical monitoring, and the Spanish experience to adapt legislation to new forms of employment. It has been concluded that combining these approaches will contribute to the formation of a modern system of social dialogue in Ukraine, oriented toward mutual responsibility and sustainable socio-economic development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it