MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115813607

Power Saving and Load Balancing for Solar WLAN

2005· dissertation· en· W7115813607 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2005
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGreen IT and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoad balancing (electrical power)WirelessImpossibilityPower savingBandwidth (computing)Service (business)Service providerWireless lanAdmission control
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The IEEE 802.11 standard has been widely adopted as a Wireless LAN (WLAN) technology. This widespread proliferation of the technology has lead to an increase in the number of users taking advantage of so-called "hot-spots" which leads to an increased demand on bandwidth provided by Access Points (APs) in the hot-spot. The logical solution is to deploy more overlapping access points in the same coverage area, thus increasing the capacity of the system by providing load balancing services. However, when a hot-spot is located in an outdoor environment, it becomes difficult to provide the AP with power which is traditionally carried over wired links thus causing the service provider to incur additional costs, not to mention the impossibility in some cases of delivering power to the AP. This problem can be overcome by using solar-panel powered APs which we will refer to as solar nodes (SNs). In this thesis we examine the load-balancing problem that arises when two or more SNs are co-located in the same coverage area. We propose and evaluate two algorithms for efficiently distributing the load among them (transferring stations (STAs) from SN to neighboring SNs) and increasing their lifetime by using power saving schemes that co-ordinate the wake/sleep patterns of the SNs based on traffic load. Finally, a Connection Admission Control (CAC) function is proposed that the SN should use in order to provide controlled access to services. We demonstrate through simulations that our proposals can significantly reduce the hardware requirements and cost of SNs and improve the service perceived by STAs in terms of transmission delay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicGreen IT and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207