MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115815787

SPATIOTEMPORAL VARIATION IN ECOSYSTEMS

2015· dissertation· en· W7115815787 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcosystemDynamismInferenceEctothermTemporal scalesVariation (astronomy)Spatial ecologySpatial analysisStability (learning theory)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ecosystems and their components (e.g., organisms, physicochemical variables) are dynamic in space and time. This dynamism makes ecological change notoriously difficult to study and manage. This thesis therefore aims to develop new ways of using spatiotemporal information for inference and prediction. Applying theoretical and statistical concepts to patterns of spatiotemporal variation in aquatic ecosystems led to three discoveries that show promise as ecological applications. First, I show that temporal variability of an ecosystem process can be inferred from its spatial variability. This application may be the first quantitative form of the widely-used method, space-for-time substitution. Its use is supported by an analytical framework giving the conditions under which space is a good surrogate for time. Second, I demonstrate the use of spatiotemporal patterns to predict responses of variables when ecosystem fragments are connected. Connection leads to large shifts in spatiotemporal pattern and other response metrics (e.g., temporal variability) for variables showing asynchrony and concentration gradients among sites (e.g., populations). Meanwhile, these changes are minimal if variables exhibit synchrony and homogeneity across space (e.g., energetic variables). A final discovery is that temporal attributes like stability are strong predictors of persistent spatial variation – a pattern that reflects how reliably resource concentrations occur in the same locations. This finding suggests the potential of time-for-space substitution, where one or few well-resolved time series could be used to infer landscape patterns. All but one of the tested approaches were data efficient and broadly-applicable across ecosystems and ecological processes. They thus contribute new possibilities for prediction when data are scarce, as well as new perspectives on dynamics in multi-variable landscapes. Research here shows that work at the intersection of spatial and temporal pattern can strengthen the interpretation of ecosystem dynamics and, more generally, foster synthesis from populations to landscapes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicSustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisFrench-language works237,207