Seclusion and restraint use in Ontario schools: Connecting disabled individuals’ experiences of maltreatment to systemic ableism in education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis research explores disabled individuals’ lived experiences of seclusion, restraint, and other kinds of mistreatment that have occurred at schools in Ontario. This study also critically examines the role that systemic ableism plays in these experiences of violence and poor treatment, which is a feature that is largely absent from current literature on the use of seclusion and restraint practices in schools. Using an epistemological and methodological approach rooted in critical disability studies, this research relied upon primary data derived from one qualitative interview that I conducted, along with secondary data from three organizational reports and two news articles. Utilizing thematic analysis, three major themes emerged from the data. The first described the lived experiences of ableist violence and maltreatment within the Ontario education system, with sub-themes detailing situations involving seclusion and restraint, destabilization, and strained relationships stemming from a lack of support. The second thematic finding highlighted the damaging impact to the wellbeing of disabled individuals resulting from degrading and ableist mistreatment in school, with notable sub-themes of the threatening emotional and physical toll on the individual and harsh self-perception. The final major finding indicated desired areas for change to counter ableist violence and improve the treatment of disabled students in Ontario schools, with sub-themes specifying the need for more specialized training for all school staff, a compassionate attitude, and improved supports to keep students in school. The discussion of these findings using critical disability perspectives on ableism illustrates the systemic issue at the core of disabled individuals lived experiences of mistreatment in Ontario schools. The implications that this study has on social work practice and educational policy is discussed, as well as areas for future research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".