MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7115817349

Investigating Speech Perception and Individual Variation in Cognitive-Behavioural Traits

2025· dissertation· en· W7115817349 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMismatch negativityCategorical perceptionVariation (astronomy)CategorizationPerceptionVowelOddball paradigmNeurotypicalElectroencephalographySpeech perception
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition associated with differences in cognition, communication and language processing. These differences may be explained by their distinct cognitive and perceptual processing styles compared to those of neurotypical individuals. Previous studies have shown that individual differences in traits linked to autism, as measured by the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ), influence speech perception and the ability to adapt to contextual variability in speech signals (Stewart & Ota, 2008; Yu, 2010). The present study examined how variation in AQ traits is associated with behavioural and neural responses to ambiguous speech sounds. Fifty-two participants completed a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) task, categorizing a continuum of fricative sounds between /s/ and /ʃ/ in different vowel contexts (/a/ and /u/). Electroencephalography (EEG) was also recorded during a passive oddball paradigm to measure mismatch negativity (MMN) brain responses to such vowel-fricative-vowel syllables. Results from the behavioural task showed strong categorical perception across participants, with vowel context reliably influencing categorization patterns. Comparison of the highest and lowest AQ quartiles showed that Low AQ participants categorized stimuli more often as /ʃ/ overall. Analysis of the 50% cross over point (PSE) indicated that High AQ participants shifted toward /ʃ/ earlier than the Low AQ group, particularly in the /u/ context. Neural responses showed that participants exhibited reliable event-related potential (ERP) responses in the MMN time window, although polarity was positive rather than negative. Group-level differences emerged in both ERP amplitude and latency, with High AQ individuals showing stronger but slower responses to stimuli in the /u/ context. These findings highlight how individual differences can shape both perceptual and neural mechanisms of speech processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research→French-language works237,207→