A SELF-LEARNING PACKAGE FOR THE ORIENTATION OF NURSE CASE MANAGERS AT THE WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE BOARD OF ONTARIO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this project is to improve the orientation program for Nurse Case Managers at the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board of Ontario. The role of the NCM and the significance of the project are explored in relation to the administration of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act (1997). The project describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of a self-learning package, which is one component of a five-week orientation program. The curriculum is based on adult learning and critical thinking theory. The theoretical frameworks for this project are: The Miller-Seller Model (1990), the Health Care Educator: the Nurturing Link (1997) developed by Barer-Stein and Connolly, and the Context-Input-Process-Product (CIPP) model developed by Stufflebeam, et al, (as cited in Miller and Seller, 1990). Based on the feedback to date, this project has already improved the orientation program for nurse case managers at WSIB. Further testing of the program can only strengthen the significance of the impact. This project concludes with recommendations to improve the orientation program for Nurse Case Mangers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".