Analisis Tingkat Learned Helplessness pada Perempuan dalam Toxic Relationship di Periode Quarter Life Crisis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Periode Quarter Life Crisis (QLC) pada perempuan yang berusia 21-25 tahun, biasanya dihadapkan dengan banyak tantangan, terutama tuntutan menuju pernikahan. Sebelum menikah, biasanya mereka melalui dengan berpacaran, namun tidak semua berjalan lancar. Dalam perjalanannya, banyak yang mengalami toxic relationship dan sulit keluar dalam hubungan tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui tingkat Learned Helplessness (LH) pada perempuan dalam toxic relationship di periode QLC. Metode yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif dengan metode deskriptif. Responden penelitian adalah 155 perempuan yang berpacaran di periode usia QLC. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan Learned Helplessness Scale (LHS) dikembangkan oleh Quinless dan Nelson (1988), dengan koefisien reliabilitas Cronbach Alpha sebesar 0,962. Penelitian ini menghasilkan 73 responden atau sebesar 47,1 % berada dalam kategori LH sangat tinggi, sebanyak 57 responden atau sebesar 36,77 % berada dalam kategori LH tinggi dan selebihnya masuk ke dalam kategori LH rendah serta LH sangat rendah.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".