MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115977442

Research of Purification of Oil Sludge Waste Mixture Using Fe2(SO4)3 As A Coagulant

2025· article· en· W7115977442 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKhazar University Institutional Repository (Khazar University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Industrial Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefineryOil refineryWaste oilWastewaterProcess (computing)Waste treatmentOil sludgeComposition (language)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the treatment of industrial waste water (IWW) formed in technological processes at the Heydar Aliyev refinery at the plant's treatment facilities, a deposition of oil sludge waste mixture (OSWM) with various composition and properties takes place on the bottom of these facilities. The definition of composition and properties of OSWM is not the main purpose of this research work. But according to the information given in the technical literature, it can be noted that OSWM contains ~5-90% oil (or oil products), 1-52% water, 0.8-65% solid impurities, the density of oil sludge is 1.5-2 g/cm3, pour point from -3°C to +80°C, flash point from 35°C to 120°C. Not only in our country, but throughout the world the problem of deep (up to 100%) ecologically effective purification of this mixture from the oil products waste mixture (OPWM) has not been completely solved until now. Despite the use of various coagulants (AlCl3, FeCl3, polyacrylamides, polyaluminum silicate chloride, polyferric silicate chloride), the maximum efficiency of purification of OSWM from OPWM was ~95% when carrying out the purification process in several stages. We conducted a study of purification of this mixture samples taken from the input of “Alpha-Laval” facility, processing OSWM at the above-mentioned plant (from the area where OSWM was collected for processing) using Fe2(SO4)3 as a coagulant. The choice of this coagulant is explained by the fact that the purification process of OSWM is simple, economically beneficial, meets all environmental safety requirements, and is carried out at room temperature. Based on the results of the study, it was established that the highly effective purification of the OSWM sample using a solution of Fe2(SO4)3 as a coagulant initially depends on the choice of an extractant, the volume of a coagulant, mixing time, the development of special optimal conditions. Treatment of OPWM from the OSWM up to 96.87% was achieved. Optimal conditions specially developed for this consist of using 5 ml of a primary gasoline fraction which is cheaper than petroleum ether as an extractant, 25 ml of a 5% solution of Fe2(SO4)3 as a coagulant, 10 ml of H2SO4 as a flocculant and interval mixing of the mixture during 6 hours at room temperature..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it