MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116047452 · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.013

Global Glaucoma Prevalence: Burden and Projection to 2060

2025· article· en· W7116047452 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health Authority
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGlaucomaProjection (relational algebra)Eye diseasePublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To provide updated global and regional estimates of the prevalence and population burden of open-angle glaucoma (OAG), incorporating both demographic aging and the rising prevalence of myopia-a major risk factor that accelerates onset and increases OAG risk. DESIGN: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and global projection study. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42024520990) of 77 population-based publications (1991-2023) were conducted to estimate current age- and region-specific OAG prevalence across Global Burden of Disease regions. OAG prevalence in 2060 was modeled based on associated risk ratios (RR: 1.9 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.7-2.1]) and myopia trends synthesized from 57 publications. United Nations population data were integrated to estimate the affected population. Early-onset OAG (20-39 years) in 2060, attributable to high myopia, was estimated separately using projected high myopia prevalence and a pooled OAG prevalence of 4.4% (95% CI, 3.5%-5.3%) in this highly myopic younger population. RESULTS: Global OAG prevalence (≥40 years) is expected to rise from 2.8% (95% CI, 2.6%-3.0%) in 2024 to 3.5% (95% CI, 3.2%-3.8%) by 2060, with the affected population increasing from 80.5 (95% CI, 75.4-85.6) million to 186.6 (95% CI, 174.3-199.0) million. Aging and demographic changes account for an increase to 77.3 million, leaving the additional 28.9 million cases (27.2% of the total increase) attributed to the myopia epidemic. An estimated 6.1 (95% CI, 5.5-6.7) million early-onset OAG cases due to high myopia will bring the total global OAG population to 192.7 (95% CI, 180.4-205.1) million by 2060. East Asia will experience the greatest relative increase, with prevalence rising by 50.5% from 2.3% (95% CI, 1.8%-2.8%) to 3.4% (95% CI, 2.7%-4.2%). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant, previously underestimated, increase in OAG burden globally, driven by the rising prevalence of myopia. This adds additional OAG burden, particularly to younger populations less than 40 years. Thus, myopia prevention and new targeted screening strategies are important to tackle OAG, especially in regions with a high prevalence of myopia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of OphthalmologySame topicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesFrench-language works237,207