MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116047683 · doi:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100679

Lower Gyrification of the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An ENIGMA-PTSD Study

2025· article· en· W7116047683 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Psychiatry Global Open Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMemory and Neural Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNIH Clinical CenterNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Social Science Fund of ChinaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchVISN 4 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical CenterClinical Science Research and DevelopmentBrain and Behavior Research FoundationRehabilitation Research and Development ServiceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaFoundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Institutes of HealthFondation Pierre Deniker pour la Recherche et la Prévention en Santé MentaleMinisterstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské RepublikyInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin, MadisonNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceMinistry of EducationInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversiteit GentCongressionally Directed Medical Research ProgramsEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentCanadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health ResearchNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and DepressionZonMwChinese Academy of SciencesMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's ResearchMajor Basic Research Project of the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education InstitutionsDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of ChinaDana FoundationU.S. Department of Veterans AffairsU.S. Department of DefenseNational Science Foundation
KeywordsVentromedial prefrontal cortexPrefrontal cortexPosttraumatic stressGyrificationStress (linguistics)Frontal lobe

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cortical gyrification involves the formation of folds in the cerebral cortex, coinciding with key neurodevelopmental processes. Its strong correlation with increased cortical surface area and decreased cortical thickness may improve cortical signaling efficiency by decreasing cortico-cortical distance. Differences in brain structure have been found in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), yet few small studies have examined cortical gyrification. Methods: = 1087) across 24 sites from the ENIGMA-PGC (Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis and Psychiatric Genomics Consortium) PTSD working group. Using a region of interest-based approach, we fitted a linear mixed-effects model with age (mean = 35.6, SD = 9.23, range = 8-95), sex (female = 967 [52%], male = 909 [48%]), pial surface area, PTSD, and random site effects to test associations between PTSD diagnosis/severity and regional lGI. We examined moderating effects of depression, childhood trauma, age, and sex. Results: PTSD diagnosis and severity were both associated with lower lGI for the right medial orbitofrontal and right rostral anterior cingulate cortices. The interaction of PTSD and age was associated with lower lGI for the rostral middle frontal cortex bilaterally. Contrasting comorbid PTSD and major depressive disorder with the PTSD-only group showed that comorbidity was associated with lower lGI in the left inferior and medial temporal cortices. Conclusions: Lower lGI, which is associated with impaired signaling efficiency, was observed in the PTSD group compared with the control group for the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, a region that has been strongly implicated in associative fear learning and extinction. It is possible that PTSD accelerates the typical age-associated decline in lGI of the rostral middle frontal cortices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiological Psychiatry Global Open ScienceSame topicMemory and Neural MechanismsFrench-language works237,207