MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116051541 · doi:10.82417/c2nj-b691

Microencapsulation of intestinal bacteria

2025· other· en· W7116051541 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspace ÉTS (ETS) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacteriaAnaerobic bacteriaProbioticAkkermansia muciniphilaMicrofluidicsGut floraMicrobiomeEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human gut microbiota plays an important role in human health; however, our understanding of the bacteria which make up the microbiota remains limited. The gaps in current knowledge can be attributed to the difficulties in culturing a major part of this diverse community using conventional in vitro techniques. The lack or absence of cell-to-cell communication and the inability to accurately replicate optimal growth conditions and nutrient requirements are some of the key limitations apparent in standard culture. Additionally, current genomic techniques struggle to reveal bacterial physiology and function, as 16S rRNA and shotgun sequencing often miss crucial microbial roles and are affected by host DNA contamination. To address this challenge, we propose an innovative approach to support the growth of difficult-to-culture bacteria by employing droplet-based microfluidics. Microfluidics techniques have shown promise in human gut microbiota, research, but the role of microencapsulation on bacteria enrichment has yet to be explored. Microencapsulation has been explored for probiotic formulation and delivery, but no studies have attempted to harness the benefits of microencapsulation to promote viability and increase biomass of difficult-to-culture gut bacteria. This study explores the use of four-arm poly(ethylene glycol) maleimide (PEG4MAL), a synthetic, non-digestible, and biocompatible material, for the microencapsulation of highly sensitive anaerobic bacteria. PEG4MAL is functionalized with 0.8 mM of RGD, and crosslinking is achieved through a rapid thiol-based reaction with 20mM dithiothreitol (DTT). Encapsulation is performed using a 70 µm junction microfluidic chip for droplet generation with syringe pump driven flow. Encapsulated Escherichia coli and Akkermansia muciniphila are fluorescently imaged after staining with a Live Dead Assay. We have demonstrated that single-cell isolation can be achieved through microbead production, which will enable the isolation of species for community-based culture. It was observed that cell behavior can be influenced by manipulating the concentration of PEG4MAL, with increased concentrations resulting in higher cell motility. Further modification of PEG4MAL through functionalization with arginylglycylaspartic acid (RGD) led to enhanced cell density within the microbeads due to peptide-cell interactions. By employing this approach, we achieved high cell viability and colony formation within the microbeads of the difficult-to-culture Akkermansia muciniphila. This increased aggregation facilitates the capture and analysis of a broader range of bacterial species, including those that are considered ‘unculturable’.This work opens the door to in situ cultivation, allowing researchers to better characterize the human gut microbiota composition and its complex interactions with human health and disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspace ÉTS (ETS)French-language works237,207