MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116065440 · doi:10.14740/wjon2647

The Role and Mechanism of G Protein Subunit Alpha-15 in Colorectal Cancer: An Analysis of Two Hundred Eight Patient Samples and Public Datasets

2025· article· en· W7116065440 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYouth Science Foundation of Guangxi Medical UniversityGuangxi Medical University
KeywordsMechanism (biology)Protein subunitReceptorCellAntibodySignal transductionAntigenCell culture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a tumor with a relatively high incidence rate. The expression of G protein subunit α-15 (GNA15) in CRC and its specific role remain unclear. Methods: This study focused on both the diagnostic potential of GNA15 and its mechanistic role in CRC progression. Relevant expression data of CRC were obtained from global databases, and the expression differences of GNA15 in CRC tissues and non-cancerous tissues were analyzed after processing. Tissue microarrays of CRC samples and surrounding non-tumor tissues from 208 CRC patients at the Red Cross Hospital of Yulin City were collected and prepared. The expression level of GNA15 was scored after immunostaining with rabbit anti-human GNA15 antibody. Meanwhile, the GNA15 gene was knocked out in CRC cells, and its effects were evaluated. Data from databases were used to explore the relationship between GNA15 expression and various pathways through Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Finally, the reliability of the conclusions was tested through statistical analysis. Results: The analysis results from the database and the tissue microarrays from the Red Cross Hospital of Yulin City both indicated that GNA15 was significantly overexpressed in CRC tissues. The gene effect scores calculated after knocking out GNA15 showed that the gene effect scores of HCC56 and DLD1 cell lines were strongly negative. GSEA indicated that the differentially expressed genes were mainly concentrated in biological processes such as antigen-antibody binding, immunoglobulin complex, phagocytosis, antigen processing and presentation, cell adhesion molecules, T helper 17 (Th17) cell differentiation, and toll-like receptor signaling pathway. This study has limitations, including a single-center retrospective cohort design and lack of in vivo validation. Conclusions: GNA15 is highly expressed in CRC and has certain diagnostic value. GNA15 may play a role in CRC through affecting the growth of cell lines such as HCC56, DLD1 and biological processes such as antigen-antibody binding, immunoglobulin complex, phagocytosis, antigen processing and presentation, cell adhesion molecules, Th17 cell differentiation, and toll-like receptor signaling pathway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of OncologySame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207