MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116074309 · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202568000054

Real-time detection of short-circuit faults in power systems using LSTM autoencoder

2025· article· fr· W7116074309 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueE3S Web of Conferences · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsCégep de l'Abitibi TémiscamingueUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)AutoencoderElectric power systemPower-system protectionFault detection and isolationPower (physics)Pattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a real-time detection method for short-circuit faults in meshed power networks, based on a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) autoencoder. The objective is to quickly and accurately identify both simple faults (single-phase, double-phase, three-phase), hybrid faults, and triple faults characterized by the simultaneous occurrence of several types of faults on different network lines. Simulations were carried out on an IEEE 9-bus system modeled in MATLAB/Simulink, covering various scenarios: faults on a single line, on two lines, and on three lines simultaneously. The results obtained show an immediate reaction of the model to disturbances, reflected by a marked increase in the loss function at the time of the incident. The system also demonstrated its ability to detect the indirect impact of faults on neighboring lines, reflecting the propagation of electrical imbalances throughout the network. These performances confirm the effectiveness and robustness of the LSTM autoencoder for intelligent, fine, and adaptive monitoring of modern power networks, fully meeting the requirements of real-time protection systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE3S Web of ConferencesSame topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207