Renal sarcomas in children and adolescents: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Renal sarcomas arise rarely in children and adolescents and represent a histologically and biologically diverse disease category. Consequently, standardizing optimal therapies for pediatric renal sarcomas remains challenging. Leveraging a large North American research collaborative, the purposes of this study were to evaluate the current state of patient, disease, and survival characteristics among pediatric renal sarcomas and to expose knowledge gaps that will inform future discovery. Methods: Patients 21 years or younger and treated for a primary renal sarcoma between January 1st, 2000 and November 30th, 2022 were identified through the Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative. Patient (e.g., demographics) and disease (e.g., histology, stage, molecular alterations) characteristics were abstracted from contributing institutions. Descriptive statistics, Pearson-Chi square (categorical variables), Kruskal-Wallis (continuous variables), Cox regression (Hazard ratios), and Kaplan-Meier 4-year event-free and overall survival (OS) analyses were completed. Findings: Among 158 patients, clear cell sarcoma of the kidney (CCSK; n = 94), Ewing sarcoma (EWS; n = 33), and undifferentiated sarcoma (n = 8) predominated. Sarcoma type correlated significantly with age at diagnosis (p < 0.0001), with infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS) and CCSK occurring in the youngest patients, whereas EWS and synovial sarcoma presented in the oldest. Predisposition syndromes were identified in 11/155 (7.1%) patients, most commonly DICER1 and Li-Fraumeni. Multimodal therapies varied significantly across sarcoma types (p = 0.0008), although nephrectomy was uniform. Tumor thrombectomy was performed in 9 patients (6 with EWS). When tested, somatic molecular alterations were observed principally in CCSK (17/38; 45%) and EWS (26/26; 100%; p = 0.001). At 4 years, OS differed significantly by sarcoma type, ranging from highest to lowest as follows: CCSK 0.927 (95% CI 0.845-0.967), EWS 0.901 (95% CI 0.723-0.967), undifferentiated sarcoma 0.833 (95% CI 0.273-0.975), IFS 0.667 (95% CI 0.054-0.945), and rhabdomyosarcoma 0.500 (95% CI 0.111-0.804; p = 0.036). Hematogenous metastases occurred most in the lungs (n = 19 total; 10 with EWS), followed by bone (n = 12), which occurred only with CCSK (n = 9) and EWS (n = 3). Two patients developed brain metastases (one each with CCSK and rhabdomyosarcoma). At 4 years, OS was 0.957 (95% CI 0.888-0.984) for patients presenting without metastases and 0.717 (95% CI 0.545-0.833) for those with metastases (p = 0.00015). Interpretation: Renal sarcomas presenting in children and adolescents comprise a heterogeneous disease category with unique patient, clinical, and molecular characteristics that complicate standardizing therapeutic strategies beyond CCSK and EWS. Funding: None.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".