MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116286716 · doi:10.14740/cr2135

<i>De Novo</i> Acute Heart Failure Versus Acute Decompensated Chronic Heart Failure: Are There Differences in In-Hospital Outcomes and Mortality?

2025· article· en· W7116286716 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Juan David Peláez-Martínez, Jackelin Mainguez, Sebastián Seni-Molina, Yorlany Rodas, Hoover O. Leon-Giraldo, MD. MSc. Diana Cristina Carrillo, Juan David Lopez-Ponce de Leon, Noel Flórez, Pastor Olaya, Edilma Lucy Rivera, Nancy Alida Laverde Olaya, Juan Esteban Gómez‐Mesa

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcute decompensated heart failureHeart failureEjection fractionHospital admissionMortality rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: acute HF (dn-AHF) may have a more severe clinical presentation. Despite extensive research on HF, comparative data on in-hospital outcomes and mortality between these groups are scarce in Latin American countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in in-hospital complications and mortality among patients hospitalized with either dn-AHF or ad-CHF. Methods: An ambispective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Colombia, including 780 patients hospitalized for acute HF. Patients were classified as dn-AHF or ad-CHF, and sociodemographic, clinical, and in-hospital outcomes were compared using bivariate analysis. A Firth penalized logistic regression model was used to assess the association between dn-AHF and in-hospital mortality. Results: Of these patients, 39.2% had dn-AHF, and 60.8% had ad-CHF. Median ages were 67 (interquartile range (IQR): 56 - 76) and 66 (IQR: 55 - 79) years, respectively. Both groups had a predominance of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, with median values of 30% in ad-CHF and 34% in dn-AHF. Ad-CHF patients had more comorbidities, whereas dn-AHF patients showed higher rates of cardiac and non-cardiac complications. Intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates were similar, the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (P < 0.001) and the occurrence of infections (P = 0.049) were significantly more frequent in patients with dn-AHF. In-hospital mortality was higher in dn-AHF than ad-CHF (9.8% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.023). After adjustment, dn-AHF remained independently associated with greater in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR): 1.87; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07 - 3.31; P = 0.029). Conclusions: Patients with dn-AHF experienced more in-hospital complications and higher mortality than those with ad-CHF, despite similar ICU admission rates and fewer comorbidities. These results highlight the prognostic importance of dn-AHF and underscore the need for early identification, vigilant monitoring, and phenotype-specific management from admission to improve outcomes, particularly among patients with reduced ejection fraction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology ResearchSame topicHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207