Perbandingan pijat bayi menggunakan minyak zaitun dan lavender terhadap durasi tidur pada bayi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Latar Belakang: Bayi membutuhkan tidur berkualitas untuk mendukung pematangan otak yang berlangsung selama tidur Rapid Eye Movement (REM). Kurangnya tidur dapat mengganggu proses tersebut dan memengaruhi hormon pertumbuhan. Di Indonesia, sekitar 44,2% bayi mengalami gangguan tidur, yang sering terjadi pada pagi hari. Namun, lebih dari 72% masyarakat masih menganggap gangguan tidur sebagai masalah yang tidak serius.Metode: Jenis penelitian pra-eksperimental menggunakan metode desain kelompok pre-test-post-test. Populasinya adalah semua bayi yang berada di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Sukalaksana, sedangkan sampel yang digunakan adalah kuota sampling. Analisis bivariatif menggunakan uji Shapiro-Wilk dan perbandingan pre dan posttest menggunakan uji t berpasangan. Membandingkan pijat bayi dengan minyak zaitun dan lavender menggunakan uji independent t test.Hasil: Analisis bivariat menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbandingan antara pijat bayi dengan minyak zaitun dan lavender terhadap durasi tidur pada bayi (p-value 0,000).Kesimpulan: Adanya perbedaan antara pijat bayi dengan minyak zaitun dan lavender terhadap durasi tidur pada bayi di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Sukalaksana Kota Tasikmalaya.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".