MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116347394 · doi:10.14288/1.0451024

Building capacity for a palliative approach to care for people with chronic, life-limiting conditions in the primary care context

2025· article· en· W7116347394 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katherine Anita Bertoni

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalliative careContext (archaeology)Primary careVariety (cybernetics)Quality of life (healthcare)Quality (philosophy)Curative careChronic care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A growing number of Canadian adults are living with chronic, life-limiting conditions such as organ disease, neurological or cognitive impairment, and frailty that impact their quality of life and death. Most Canadians are likely to need palliative care due to chronic conditions but few receive it outside of hospitals, often in the final days or weeks of life, or not at all. Within the literature, a palliative approach to care is increasingly being recognized as an exemplary approach to patient-centred chronic care. A palliative approach blends chronic illness management and palliative care principles to address a person’s care needs early and throughout the trajectory of a chronic condition and has been associated with better quality of life and death. Best practices suggest primary care could be an exemplary environment where a palliative approach is integrated ‘upstream’ and then followed throughout the course of their condition. Despite the evidence showing considerable benefits, several barriers to integrating this type of care approach routinely into primary care remain. Interpretive Description was employed as the methodological framework to better understand how to overcome barriers and build greater capacity for a palliative approach to care in a primary care context for this population. Twenty-six individual interviews were conducted and inductively analyzed to generate new knowledge and practical insight from practitioners and stakeholders with expertise using a palliative approach in a variety of locations in British Columbia, Canada. Participants identified practice and system level changes that could help overcome existing barriers and inspire primary care providers to integrate a palliative approach into practice. Suggestions include a team or shared-care approach, peer mentorship and support, better utilization of primary care nurses and nurse practitioners, and a stronger investment at practice and system levels. Practice implications include a more precise understanding of a palliative approach to care, greater equity and consistency across provincial healthcare structures and supports, and replicating practice models that have been shown to work. Areas for further research include exploring barriers and facilitators to integrating a palliative approach from patient and caregiver perspectives and active engagement of nurses as knowledge users to enable change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0270.033
Scholarly communication0.0130.009
Open science0.0040.027
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Collections→Same topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues→French-language works237,207→