MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116430689 · doi:10.20381/ruor-31633

Indigenous Im/mobility in Tthets'éhkédélį (Jean Marie River), Dehcho, Northwest Territories

2025· dissertation· en· W7116430689 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brandon Pludwinski

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa - Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousStewardship (theology)Traditional knowledgeReflexivityMeaning (existential)Field researchColonialismMetis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Dehcho Region of Canada's Northwest Territories, the Tthets'éhk'édélı̨ Got'ie (people downriver of McGill Lake), like many other Indigenous Peoples in North America and around the world, have traditionally practiced im/mobility, movement and stasis across time and space, since time immemorial. This research draws on im/mobility theory to highlight the social, cultural, political, and economic relations that inform how Indigenous Peoples move through time and space. Their im/mobility, often coded as seasonal rounds, reflects embodied relationships to land, culture, and community that shape Traditional Knowledge and spiritual, political, and stewardship responsibilities. In recent decades, colonial pressures and anthropogenic climate changes have pressed against these relationships and influenced im/mobility meanings, practices, and values. This study aims to examine how the Tthets'éhk'édélı̨ Got'ie experience and give meaning to im/mobility as a relationally informed practice in the Dehcho Region. It aims to (1) investigate the values that influence how the Tthets'éhkédélį Got'ie move through time and space, contributing to a culturally grounded framework to articulate im/mobility; (2) foreground Indigenous relationships to land and climate change to understand how im/mobility functions as an embodied, relational practice; and (3) examine how im/mobility operates as pedagogy amidst assertions of Indigenous sovereignty. The methodological approach adopted in this dissertation shows how non-Indigenous scholars can work with Indigenous communities to conduct relationally informed, ethical research. It outlines one approach to identifying and centering community research priorities and responsibly reciprocating knowledge through embodied, written, audible, and visual methods. It draws on qualitative interview data and reflexive field notes from an immersive field experience (January 2023 - June 2023) and several years of community visits (and relationships) to show that im/mobility is not simply about movement through time and space, it is a relational practice that draws on connections with the land, subsistence autonomy, and the transmission of Traditional Knowledge. This research also shows how the Tthets'éhkédélį Got'ie are using im/mobility to relationally respond to climate and environmental changes, highlighting the ongoing and dynamic process of cultural continuity and survival. Finally, it explores how im/mobility embodies land-based sovereignty, pedagogy, and resistance to colonial containment. This approach exposes alternative ways knowing the human-nature relationship in the context of im/mobility, offering insight into alternative ways of responding to climate and environmental changes and enacting pedagogy. This dissertation further showcases the importance of culturally relevant approaches to conceptualizing alternative meanings, values, and structures that shape how people relate to movement through time and space. It expands the scope of im/mobility research by focusing on Indigenous logics, perspectives, and meanings. Policy makers and community programmers can draw on this research to further root their im/mobility-related programing (e.g., community harvest programs) in Indigenous worldviews and perspectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Ottawa - LibrarySame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207