A Supportive Group Intervention for Caregivers to Patients Diagnosed With Glioblastoma: Protocol for the SUGRI Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Caregivers to a person diagnosed with a glioblastoma often face significant responsibilities, balancing the demands of care with the complexities of the disease and treatment trajectory, while also coping with concerns and uncertainty of the future. Caregivers report unmet needs of information and support throughout the patient's disease and treatment trajectory, and they may benefit from targeted supportive care interventions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to develop, test, and evaluate the feasibility of a supportive group intervention among caregivers to patients diagnosed with a glioblastoma. METHODS: The study consists of 3 phases with ongoing patient and public involvement (PPI). In the first phase, a systematic review will be carried out exploring the outcome of supportive group interventions for caregivers to patients diagnosed with a primary brain tumor. In the second phase, the design and development of the intervention will be conducted in cooperation with a panel of caregivers using PPI process. The third phase will include the feasibility and evaluation of the intervention. The study will be guided by the British Medical Research Council's framework for developing complex interventions. The feasibility of the intervention will be tested in reference to relevant parameters. Quantitative data in terms of questionnaires will be analyzed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative evaluation interviews will be analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: A national panel of caregivers (N=10) has been established, and the final design of the intervention is currently developed through an ongoing PPI process. A total of 3 hospitals in Denmark have committed to participating in the recruitment for the feasibility study. Recruitment began in April 2025, and the SUGRI (Supportive Group Intervention for caregivers to patients diagnosed with a glioblastoma) intervention will undergo a feasibility assessment in a multicenter study starting in August 2025, with the final evaluation planned for April 2026. CONCLUSIONS: This study is expected to provide necessary insights to guide caregiver initiatives, ultimately improving support for caregivers within the neuro-oncology field. A supportive group intervention offered to the caregivers has the potential to address specific caregiver needs and strengthen their supportive network. Providing caregivers with support may enhance their perceived support, strengthen family functioning, and provide them with strategies to manage caregiving challenges, ultimately benefiting both caregivers and patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06869577; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06869577. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/81948.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.040 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".