Clinico Diagnostic Aspects of Hepatogenic Ascites in Dogs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present investigation was carried out to study the occurrence and causes of ascites in dogs. Out of 4704 dogs screened during the study period 48 dogs were found positive for ascites. Among 48 ascitic dogs, 21 dogs had ascites due to hepatic origin (43.75%). Age wise occurrence was higher in dogs aged between 1-4 years. Labrador retriever was most commonly affected breed. Male animals were most commonly affected than females. The major clinical signs recorded were inappetence (66.67%), vomiting (47.61%), melena (42.85%), weight loss (42.85%), pedal edema (38.09%), dark yellowish urination (71.42%) and icterus (38.09%). Out of 21 dogs suffered with ascites of hepatic origin, grade 1 ascites was observed in 2 dogs, grade 2 ascites in 10 dogs and grade 3 ascites was observed in 9 dogs. Haemato biochemical analysis revealed a significant (P<0.05) decrease in haemoglobin, total protein and albumin whereas significant (P<0.05) increase in ALT, AST ALP levels were noticed in affected dogs. Ground glass appearance with loss of serosal details (75%), hepatomegaly (20%) were major abdominal radiographic findings. Sonographic examination revealed anechoic peritoneal fluid in all the dogs (100%). Overall, the findings emphasize that hepatogenic ascites remains a significant clinical condition in dogs and requires a comprehensive diagnostic approach. This includes incorporating haemato-biochemical analysis together with imaging evaluation for identification of hepatic disorders and to enable timely therapeutic intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".