Influence of Patient Characteristics on the Effectiveness of Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy for Pulmonary Hypertension Following Cardiac Surgery: A Post-marketing Surveillance in Japan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
for Inhalation 800 ppm in Japan (N = 2,817) established its real-world safety and effectiveness in improving hemodynamic parameters during the perioperative period in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, the patient population was heterogeneous with respect to characteristics such as age and baseline hemodynamic parameters. Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate patient characteristics associated with the effectiveness of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) for pulmonary hypertension following cardiac surgery in Japan. Methods This study was a retrospective analysis of the PMS data of INOflo. Adults aged ≥15 years with a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥20 mmHg at baseline (i.e., prior to iNO initiation) who commenced iNO following cardiac surgery were included. The PMS prospectively monitored the safety and effectiveness of INOflo in Japan. The primary endpoint was the change in mPAP from baseline to 24 hours after iNO initiation. Multivariable regression analysis explored patient characteristics (age, BMI, sex, and prior pulmonary vasodilator medication) associated with the primary endpoint. Results A total of 427 Japanese patients were included (median (IQR) age: 71.0 (60.0-77.0) years). Significant improvements in hemodynamic parameters were observed, including mPAP at 24 and 48 hours from baseline. No patient characteristics were significantly associated with the change in mPAP from baseline to 24 hours after iNO initiation. However, patients aged 30 years or with a BMI of 35 did not show significant changes in mPAP, whereas other age and BMI categories demonstrated statistically significant improvements. Conclusions iNO treatment was associated with improvements in hemodynamics in patients with pulmonary hypertension following cardiac surgery, irrespective of patient characteristics such as age, BMI, sex, or prior pulmonary vasodilator therapy in this analysis. Conversely, the models suggest that differences in age and BMI may influence the magnitude of iNO effectiveness on the change in mPAP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".