MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116679232 · doi:10.1093/jhps/hnaf069.363

EP265 The Impact of Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters And Kinematics on the Morphology and Symptomatology of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2025· article· en· W7116679232 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yoan Bourgeault-Gagnon, Christa Maurice, Joshua A J Keogh, Isabelle Keng, João Dinis, Manraj S. Nijjar, O. Ayeni

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hip Preservation Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFemoroacetabular impingementAsymptomaticSagittal planePelvisRadiographyPelvic tilt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) morphology is frequently observed in asymptomatic populations, with up to 30% demonstrating radiographic evidence of cam or mixed-type deformities. Spinopelvic balance influences the orientation of the pelvis and acetabulum, potentially altering hip mechanics and modulating FAI presentation. However, the precise impact of spinopelvic parameters on FAI remains unclear. Purpose To enhance understanding of the pathogenesis of FAI and to inform potential prevention and therapeutic targets, this study aimed to clarify the relationship between spinopelvic balance, FAI morphology, and symptomatology. Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus was performed from inception to December 23, 2024, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting spinopelvic parameters in symptomatic or asymptomatic FAI (with comparisons among FAI subgroups or with controls) were included. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS), with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Pairwise meta-analyses of mean differences were stratified by FAI type, symptomatology/morphology, and spinopelvic parameters. Results Of 1824 articles screened, 41 studies (3750 participants: 1343 symptomatic FAI, 821 asymptomatic FAI, 1586 controls) met inclusion criteria. The median NOS score was 6 (range, 2–8). A greater pelvic incidence (PI) was associated with cam morphology becoming symptomatic (mean difference [MD] = 4.94° [95%CI –0.1, 9.98]; p=0.05), whereas a smaller PI correlated with the presence of pincer morphology (MD = –4.49° [–6.21, –2.76]; p<0.01), as well as an corresponding trend observed between lower PI and cam morphology (MD = 1.75° [−0.70, 4.19], p>0.05). No statistically significant findings emerged regarding postural parameters. Kinematic findings showed reduced second-half posterior pelvic excursion in symptomatic and morphological cam FAI during deep flexion squatting (MD = –5.23° [–7.17, –3.30]; p<0.01), and increased global pelvic excursion during gait (MD = 0.38° [0.05, 0.72]; p=0.03). Conclusion Reduced pelvic rollback and a tendency toward greater anterior tilt were associated with symptomatic FAI, indicating potential targets for conservative management. Lower pelvic incidence was linked to FAI morphologies, suggesting preventive strategies during skeletal development. These findings underscore the importance of dynamic spinopelvic parameters in shaping future research and refining clinical counseling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hip Preservation SurgerySame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207