MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Possible dickinsoniomorphs from the latest Ediacaran Nama Group, southern Namibia

2025· article· en· W7116694082 on OpenAlexafffund
Brandt M. Gibson, Joshua H.F.L. Davies, Simon A.F. Darroch, Ajani Bissick, Andrea Boscaini, Galen P. Halverson, Frederick J. Hilgen, Peter R. Liberty, Johnathan Sorrentino, Bianca Spiering, Patricia Vickers-Rich, Marc Laflamme

Bibliographic record

VenuePrecambrian Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
KeywordsPrecambrianExtinction (optical mineralogy)Extinction eventTaxonPeriod (music)Abiotic componentPhanerozoicTrace fossil

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The late Neoproterozoic Ediacaran Period is marked by one or more pulses of biotic turnover thought to represent intervals of global extinction, and which removed several enigmatic groups of Precambrian metazoans over a ∼10-million-year interval in the lead-up to the Cambrian. Here, we report the discovery of putative dickinsoniomorph ‘survivors’ from the Nama Group of southern Namibia, including specimens preserved in place directly above an ash bed dated in this study at 538.97 ± 0.21 Ma, and thus within error of the currently defined Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary. Some key features are poorly preserved and thus identification at this point is not definitive; however, following comparisons with a wide variety of other Ediacaran taxa and abiotic structures, we argue that interpretation as dickinsonimorph body fossils is most parsimonious. More material is undoubtedly required; however, if supported these fossils would represent the youngest dickinsoniomorph fossils found anywhere in the world, showing that this group survived the first pulse of Ediacaran extinction at ∼550 Ma, and necessitating a re-evaluation of hypothesized drivers of late Ediacaran biotic turnover events. We suggest that these new fossil discoveries are consistent with recent models of selective extinction driven by pulses of ecological stress, reinforcing the inference that environmental perturbations were likely a crucial influence on patterns of early animal evolution prior to the main phase of the Cambrian explosion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrecambrian ResearchSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207