MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116694419 · doi:10.1093/jhps/hnaf069.059

PL3.7 The Role of Mental Health in the Presentation and Outcomes of Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A prospective multicenter study

2025· article· en· W7116694419 on OpenAlexaff
Sasha Carsen, Vivek P. Shah, Yi-Meng Yen, Matthew R. Schmitz, Henry Ellis, John C Clohisy, ANCHOR Study Group, Jeffrey Nepple

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hip Preservation Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyDepression (economics)Mental healthFemoroacetabular impingementProspective cohort studyHospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleHip arthroscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Mental health disorders, particularly anxiety and depression, are frequently observed in patients with hip disorders, including femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The impact of these conditions on clinical presentation and postoperative outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to 1) assess the rates of anxiety and depression in patients presenting with symptomatic FAI and 2) evaluate differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between those with and without significant anxiety or depression symptoms. Methods This multicenter, prospective study involved 677 hips undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAI across 13 surgeons at 16 institutions from 2020 to 2022. Patients with prior ipsilateral surgeries, acetabular dysplasia (LCEA<20 degrees), or associated diagnoses (SCFE, Perthes) were excluded. Baseline and one-year follow-up included assessment of PROs, including PROMIS anxiety and depression. Clinically significant mental health symptoms were defined according to established thresholds for anxiety (PROMIS anxiety ≥62) and depression (PROMIS depression ≥60). Results 551 hips (81.3%) were successfully followed at a minimum 1-year timepoint. The mean age was 24.8±7.9 years with 54.1% female. At one-year follow-up, mental health PROs improved from 51.7±10.2 to 47.9±11.3 for PROMIS Anxiety (p<0.001) and from 48.3±9.6 to 45.7±9.8 for PROMIS Depression (p<0.001). Rates of significant anxiety decreased postoperatively from 17.0% to 11.5%, significant depression decreased from 11.9% to 8.8%, and having either anxiety or depression decreased from 20.7% to 14.5%. Patients with significant baseline depression symptoms had inferior postoperative outcomes than those without, including lower mHHS (80.6±15.1 vs. 87.4±13.7, p<0.001) and lower iHOT-12 (62.6±27.8 vs. 76.7±23.3, p<0.001). Patients with significant baseline anxiety symptoms had inferior outcomes than those without, including lower mHHS (81.3±15.8 vs. 87.7±13.3, p<0.001) and lower iHOT-12 (62.8±28.1 vs. 77.7±22.6, p<0.001). Similarly, patients with significant baseline depression or anxiety symptoms had lower achievement rates for Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) (depression:75% vs. 88%; anxiety:79% vs. 88%) and higher composite failure rates (depression:21% vs. 8%; anxiety:18% vs. 8%). Conclusion We highlighted the prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI and their association with inferior postoperative outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of preoperative mental health assessments and potential interventions to improve surgical outcomes in patients with FAI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hip Preservation SurgerySame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207