MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nirsevimab Against Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits for Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in Infants

2025· article· en· W7116695411 on OpenAlexaff
Dewan Md. Sumsuzzman, Congjie Shi, Joanne M. Langley, Seyed M. Moghadas

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Pediatrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie UniversityYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmergency departmentRespiratory tract infectionsLower respiratory tract infectionYoung adultMEDLINEHealth careRetrospective cohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Nirsevimab, a long-acting monoclonal antibody available since 2023, has demonstrated effectiveness in preventing lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in clinical trials and postlicensure settings. However, its broader real-world associations with respiratory-related outcomes in infants remain unclear, and characterizing these associations is essential to inform pediatric immunization policy. Objective: To evaluate the real-world association of nirsevimab with LRTI-related hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits in infants. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Global Health, and medRxiv databases were systematically searched for observational studies published between January 1, 2023, and June 20, 2025. Data analysis was performed between January 1, 2025, and June 20, 2025. Study Selection: Postlicensure observational studies reporting original data on the effectiveness of nirsevimab immunization programs in infants and children aged 24 months or younger in routine clinical settings were eligible for inclusion. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality using the Critical Appraisal Checklist of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were all-cause LRTI-related hospitalization, all-cause hospitalization, all-cause LRTI-related ED visit, and RSV-LRTI-related ED visit. Results: Of 1752 records screened, 15 studies met inclusion criteria; 11 studies were from 5 countries included in the meta-analysis, comprising 236 764 infants and children in the nirsevimab group and 27 522 in the control group. Compared with controls, nirsevimab was associated with lower odds of all-cause LRTI-related hospitalization (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.28-0.53), all-cause LRTI-related ED visits (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.73), and RSV-LRTI-related ED visits (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13-0.47). No significant difference was observed in all-cause hospitalizations (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.14-2.20) between the nirsevimab and control groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this meta-analysis, nirsevimab was associated with reduced LRTI-related hospitalizations and ED visits in infants and young children. These findings support nirsevimab's potential to reduce respiratory-related morbidity in young children and health care utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA PediatricsSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207