MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116708813 · doi:10.1097/bn9.0000000000000035

Frailty and In-Hospital Mortality Following Complete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

2025· article· en· W7116708813 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher S. Lozano, Husain Shakil, Armaan K. Malhotra, Jefferson R. Wilson, Christopher D. Witiw, Jetan H. Badhiwala

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentrePublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpinal cord injuryProportional hazards modelCohortLogistic regressionQuality of life (healthcare)Cohort studyBluntMortality rateInjury Severity Score

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Study Design: Retrospective multicenter cohort study. Objective: To evaluate the independent association between frailty and in-hospital mortality among adults with complete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) who underwent surgical intervention. Summary of Background Data: Traumatic cervical SCI is a devastating condition associated with high rates of morbidity and early mortality. While advanced age and injury severity are established risk factors, frailty has emerged as a promising marker of physiological vulnerability. However, its prognostic value in complete cervical SCI remains unclear. Materials and Methods: Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) between 2017 and 2022. Adults (≥18 y) with blunt traumatic complete cervical SCI who underwent spinal surgery were included. Frailty was measured using the modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) and categorized as robust (0), prefrail (1), or frail (≥2). The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for demographic, clinical, injury-related, and hospital-level variables. A subgroup analysis was performed in patients aged 65 years or older. A predictive model for in-hospital mortality was developed using LASSO logistic regression. Results: Among 9457 patients, 70% were robust, 18% prefrail, and 12% frail. In-hospital mortality rates were 6% (robust), 15% (prefrail), and 23% (frail). Kaplan-Meier curves showed stepwise decreases in survival with increasing frailty (log-rank P <0.001). In adjusted Cox models, frailty was independently associated with mortality (HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.19–1.77; P <0.001), an association that persisted in patients aged 65 years or older (HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.11–2.26). The LASSO prediction model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC=0.811), with frailty among the top predictors of mortality. Conclusions: Frailty is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in adults undergoing surgery for complete cervical SCI. These findings support routine frailty assessment to enhance early risk stratification, prognostication, and patient-centered decision-making in spinal trauma care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpine Open→Same topicSpinal Cord Injury Research→French-language works237,207→