MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116712331 · doi:10.4000/15ero

L’inégal état des lieux. Ce que la mondialisation fait à la ville portuaire de Colón au Panama

2025· article· fr· W7116712331 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Manuel Sahuquet, Iwan Le Berre, Antoine Frémont, Clément Iphar, Eric Foulquier

Bibliographic record

VenueVertigO · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Panama canalPosition (finance)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colón est la ville portuaire située à l’entrée nord du canal de Panama. Son histoire est intimement liée à celle du commerce transisthmique et sa position stratégique a permis l’essor d’activités portuaires, commerciales et maritimes parmi les plus denses de toutes les Amériques, au cœur de la mondialisation. Mais ces activités ne sont pas sans répercussions. Elles génèrent des externalités environnementales qui semblent exposer en premier lieu les communautés défavorisées, majoritairement afro-panaméennes, du Casco Viejo. Dans un contexte où les données environnementales sont lacunaires, cet article montre que les activités du transport maritime peuvent être vectrices d’inégalités environnementales, en utilisant une méthodologie volontairement exploratoire, qui mobilise des données qualitatives et quantitatives. Celle-ci combine une approche sensible par analyse du paysage, des entretiens semi-directifs menés auprès d’acteurs du territoire, une revue de la presse locale et de la littérature scientifique, la spatialisation de données socio-économiques issues des recensements nationaux, ainsi que la cartographie des activités maritimo-portuaires vectrices de risques et de pollutions. Cette réflexion sur l’état des lieux de la mondialisation s’appuie enfin sur des observations de l’espace du quotidien.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVertigOSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207