MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116728324 · doi:10.4108/eettti.10443

A Hybrid Ensemble Deep Learning and Reservoir Computing Approach for Exchange Rate Prediction

2025· article· W7116728324 on OpenAlexaffabout
Senthan Prasanth, Chau Bao Phung

Bibliographic record

VenueEAI Endorsed Transactions on Tourism Technology and Intelligence · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExchange rateCurrencyUs dollarReservoir computingDeep learningArtificial neural networkLiberian dollarMean squared error

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nation's currency plays a vital role in stabilizing the economy and determining exchange rates in global markets. Keeping track of the influential currencies while comparing them with one's own currency becomes essential these days. During this study, we have specifically focused on the exchange rate prediction between the United States dollar (USD) and the Canadian dollar (CAD). This pair is one of the most active currency pairs with significant economic implications for both nations. This paper studies the use of machine learning models for this specific matter, which includes long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent units (GRU), and reservoir computing (RC) echo state network models. They were evaluated not only as individual models but also in various hybrid combinations. A hybrid model which combines LSTM and RC yielded better performance in terms of Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Coefficient of Determination (R2). Moreover, the full potential of RC represents a promising direction for future researchers to incorporate into time series analysis. In addition, considering internal and external factors that influence the exchange rate during model development would also give more accurate predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEAI Endorsed Transactions on Tourism Technology and IntelligenceSame topicNeural Networks and Reservoir ComputingFrench-language works237,207