Mapping cellular targets of covalent cancer drugs in the entire mammalian body
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As our understanding of biological systems reaches single-cell and high spatial resolutions, it becomes imperative that pharmacological approaches match this precision to understand drug actions. This need is particularly urgent for the targeted covalent inhibitors that are currently re-entering the stage for cancer treatments. By leveraging the unique kinetics of click reactions, we developed volumetric clearing-assisted tissue click chemistry (vCATCH) to enable deep and homogeneous click labeling across the three-dimensional (3D) mammalian body. With simple and passive incubation steps, vCATCH offers cellular-resolution drug imaging in the entire adult mouse. We combined vCATCH with hydrogel-based reinforcement of three-dimensional imaging solvent-cleared organs (HYBRiD) imaging and virtual reality to visualize and quantify in vivo targets of two clinical cancer drugs, afatinib and ibrutinib, which recapitulated their known pharmacological distribution and revealed previously unreported tissue and cell-type engagement potentially linked to off-target effects. vCATCH provides a body-wide, unbiased platform to map covalent drug engagements at unprecedented scale and precision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".