MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116743195 · doi:10.1093/jhps/hnaf069.362

EP264 Lack of Validated Patient Reported Outcome Tools Persists in Pediatric and Adolescent Hip Arthroscopy – A Systematic Review

2025· article· en· W7116743195 on OpenAlexaff
Ayomide Michael Ade-Conde, Brendan Amoyaw, Yoan Bourgeault-Gagnon, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Nicole Simunovic, O. Ayeni

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hip Preservation Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHip arthroscopyFemoroacetabular impingementPatient-reported outcomeMEDLINESystematic reviewEvidence-based medicinePresentation (obstetrics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose Hip arthroscopy is increasingly used in hip pathologies in children and adolescents. However, the validity of adult-derived patient-reported outcome (PRO) tools in pediatric patients remains unclear. This study aims to identify commonly used PRO scores in this subgroup and evaluate their validity. Methods Two systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL, from inception to March 31st, 2024 and August 22nd, 2024, respectively, followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The first search identified PRO instruments used in studies on hip arthroscopy on patients aged 19 and under. The second focused on clinimetric properties of these tools in pediatric hip arthroscopy. PRO utilization was stratified by pathology, trends over 5-year intervals from 2005 to 2024, and publication type. A descriptive analysis was planned for clinimetric studies. Results Fifty-seven studies were included, identifying 10 hip-specific and 5 nonspecific PROs. The second search did not identify any clinimetric studies on these tools used in pediatric patients. The most commonly reported hip-specific PRO were the modified Hip Harris Score (mHHS) (n=48), the Hip Outcome Score – Sport Specific Subscale (HOS-SS) (n=25) and the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (n=20). Hip arthroscopy was used to treat over seven different conditions, with femoroacetabular impingement being the most common (n=41, 77%). Between 2005 and 2024, the variety of hip-specific PROs increased, with seven new introduced by 2019-2024. Additionally, this study found a relatively equal distribution of outcomes across presentation abstracts and manuscripts. Conclusion The key finding of this study is the ongoing lack of hip-specific PRO tools in the pediatric hip arthroscopy literature, with reliance on adult-derived instruments. The absence of clinimetric studies and heterogeneity in PRO use emphasises the need for standardized, pediatric-specific tools. Developing and validating such instruments should be prioritized to ensure accurate, age-appropriate outcome assessment and care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hip Preservation SurgerySame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207