MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116750688 · doi:10.14746/aq.2025.36.8

Hybrydowa pamięć architektoniczna w grach wideo. Między doświadczeniem realnym a wirtualnym

2025· article· pl· W7116750688 on OpenAlex
Emilia Kiecko

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArtium Quaestiones · 2025
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureNarrativePremiseSign (mathematics)Key (lock)AllegoryMechanism (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the complex relationship between architecture in video games and memory, which shapes how it is experienced and interpreted. It begins from the premise that video games generate and employ a distinctive form of spatial memory, one that combines encounters with real architecture, media conventions, and cultural expectations tied to particular types of spaces. This hybrid form of memory functions as a kind of palimpsest, layering real and virtual experiences. Scholars have proposed various theoretical frameworks for understanding architecture in games: Espen Aarseth regarded it as an allegory of real space; Celia Pearce as the art of designing experiences; Christopher Totten as a functional analogue of actual architecture; Gabriele Aroni as a complex iconic sign or a “digital capriccio”; and Henry Jenkins, above all, as a narrative tool. Despite their differences, these perspectives converge on the assumption that a shared mechanism of memory underlies the operation of architecture in games. The analysis also draws on several key concepts of memory. Henri Bergson’s idea of the bodily rootedness of perception, developed further by Juhani Pallasmaa, explains the paradox of experiencing immaterial architecture as real. Kaja Silverman’s notion of the “remembering look” sheds light on how players reinterpret virtual spaces. Alison Landsberg’s concept of “prosthetic memory” clarifies how media produce memories of places and events never personally encountered, while Astrid Erll’s idea of “transcultural memory” illuminates the circulation of architectural memory across global cultural contexts. A central case study is the reconstruction of Notre-Dame Cathedral in Assassin’s Creed: Unity (Ubisoft Montréal, 2014). The virtual model of the monument, while distinguished by impressive attention to detail and extensive use of historical sources, also incorporates deliberate anachronisms. These design choices stemmed from a multilayered strategy in which the aim was less historical fidelity than the evocation of spatial sensations approximating the experience of the actual building, as well as an appeal to contemporary imaginings of the cathedral. Such anachronisms can be interpreter through Georges Didi-Huberman’s concept of anachronism, which holds that every act of memory is by definition anachronistic. This framework helps explain why the game’s version of Notre-Dame was perceived by players as so “authentic.” Following the fire at the actual cathedral in 2019, rumours circulated that the game’s model might be used in its reconstruction. Although repeatedly denied, these speculations were not entirely dispelled. Their persistence testifies to the success of the visual strategy employed by the game’s designers: despite numerous anachronisms and conscious deviations from historical accuracy, they created a virtual cathedra that for many audiences became as “real” as the original. This case of virtual spaces infiltrating collective memory and imagination represents, to date, perhaps the most striking consequence of the hybrid memory shaped by video games.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it