MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116761616 · doi:10.1002/lol2.70092

Pigment evidence of phytoplankton community shifts driven by rapid changes in the western Arctic Ocean, 2008–2018

2025· article· en· W7116761616 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yanpei Zhuang, Haiyan Jin, Yang Zhang, Di Qi, Jianfang Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueLimnology and Oceanography Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Fujian ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhytoplanktonArcticBiogeochemical cycleCanada BasinOcean gyrePlanktonChlorophyll aClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rapid warming in the Arctic have influenced the ecological and biogeochemical systems in the Arctic Ocean, particularly the phytoplankton community that plays a fundamental role in food webs and carbon cycle. Our 10‐yr study found an abrupt change in the phytoplankton community in the western Arctic Ocean basin between 2008 and 2018. This shift involved the replacement of nanoplanktonic prymnesiophytes with picoplanktonic prasinophytes. This change was closely associated with a sudden deepening of both the nitracline (from an average depth of 37 ± 15 to 45 ± 8 m) and the chlorophyll maximum layer (from an average depth of 47 ± 16 to 57 ± 10 m) after 2012, driven by thickening of the relatively fresh surface layer ( S < 31) in the western Arctic Ocean basin. The northwestward movement and intensification of the Beaufort Gyre may have exacerbated this surface freshening of the western Arctic Ocean by regulating freshwater redistribution, thereby driving changes in the phytoplankton community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLimnology and Oceanography LettersSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207