MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116777635 · doi:10.64898/2025.12.18.695235

Reinke crystals are immunoreactive for purine-synthesizing metabolic enzymes

2025· article· W7116777635 on OpenAlexaff
John Woulfe, Trevor A. Flood, Sharlene Faulkes, DG Munoz

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiochemical and Molecular Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPurine metabolismEnzymePurineNucleotideCytoplasmLeydig cellTestosterone (patch)Leydig Cell Tumor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Reinke crystals are a defining histological feature of human adult Leydig cells, the testosterone producing cells of the testis. These structures are present in the cytoplasm and the nucleus and display quantitative alterations in a variety of physiological and pathological contexts. The functional significance and protein composition of Reinke crystals have remained elusive for over a century. Here, we demonstrate that Reinke crystals are intensely immunoreactive for inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), and phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthetase (PRPS), two key rate-limiting enzymes in the de novo synthesis of purine nucleotides. IMPDH and PRPS are two of several metabolic enzymes that are capable of forming mesoscale filamentous aggregates as a mechanism to regulate enzyme activity. IMPDH is also able to form crystals in cellulo . Our observations link Reinke crystal formation to purine nucleotide metabolism in Leydig cells. We discuss how this novel finding may relate to the unique dependence of Leydig cells on guanyl-based purine nucleotides for testosterone synthesis. The results of this study may have important implications for understanding metabolic contributions to male reproductive disorders as well as offering a novel diagnostic and theranostic tool applicable to Leydig cell neoplasms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicBiochemical and Molecular ResearchFrench-language works237,207