MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116791782 · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2025.106168

Multivariate kernel regression in vector and product metric spaces

2025· article· en· W7116791782 on OpenAlexafffund
Marcia M. A. Schafgans, Victoria Zinde‐Walsh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Econometrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAsymptotic distributionEstimatorLocal asymptotic normalityNonparametric regressionKernel (algebra)Kernel density estimationRegression analysisPointwiseFunctional principal component analysisMultivariate statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper derives limit properties of nonparametric kernel regression estimators without requiring existence of density for regressors in R q . In functional regression limit properties are established for multivariate functional regression. The rate and asymptotic normality for the Nadaraya–Watson (NW) estimator is established for distributions of regressors in R q that allow for mass points, factor structure, multicollinearity and nonlinear dependence, as well as fractal distribution; when bounded density exists we provide statistical guarantees for the standard rate and the asymptotic normality without requiring smoothness. We demonstrate faster convergence associated with dimension reducing types of singularity, such as a fractal distribution or a factor structure in the regressors. The paper extends asymptotic normality of kernel functional regression to multivariate regression over a product of any number of metric spaces. Finite sample evidence confirms rate improvement due to singularity in regression over R q . For functional regression the simulations underline the importance of accounting for multiple functional regressors. We demonstrate the applicability and advantages of the NW estimator in our empirical study, which reexamines the job training program evaluation based on the LaLonde data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.216
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of EconometricsSame topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207