Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias From Spontaneous Speech Using Foundation Speech and Language Models: Comparative Evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are progressive neurodegenerative conditions where early detection is critical for timely intervention and care planning. However, current diagnostic methods are often inaccessible, costly, and delayed, especially for underserved populations. There is a growing need for scalable, noninvasive tools that can support timely diagnosis. Spontaneous speech contains rich acoustic and linguistic markers that can serve as noninvasive behavioral markers for cognitive decline. Foundation models, pretrained on large-scale audio or text data, generate high-dimensional embeddings that encode rich contextual and acoustic information. OBJECTIVE: This study benchmarks open-source foundation language and speech models to evaluate their effectiveness in detecting ADRD from spontaneous speech as a potential solution for early, noninvasive, and scalable ADRD detection. METHODS: In this study, we used the Pioneering Research for Early Prediction of Alzheimer's and Related Dementias EUREKA (PREPARE) Challenge dataset, which consists of audio recordings from over 1600 participants with 3 distinct categories of cognitive decline: healthy control (HC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer's disease (AD). We further excluded samples that are non-English, nonspontaneous speech, or of poor quality. Our final samples included 703 (59.13%) HC, 81 (6.81%) MCI, and 405 (34.06%) AD cases. We systematically benchmarked 18 open-source foundation speech and language models to classify cognitive status into 3 categories (HC, MCI, or AD). Post hoc interpretability analysis was performed for the best-performing model using Shapley additive explanations linking high-dimensional embeddings with explainable acoustic and linguistic markers. RESULTS: Whisper-medium model achieved the highest performance among speech models at 0.731 accuracy and 0.802 area under the curve, while Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers with pause annotation achieved the top accuracy of 0.662 and 0.744 area under the curve among language models. Overall, ADRD detection based on state-of-the-art automatic speech recognition model-generated audio-embeddings outperformed other models, and the inclusion of nonsemantic information, such as pause patterns, consistently improved the classification performance of text-embedding-based models. CONCLUSIONS: Our work presents a comprehensive comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art speech and language models for AD and MCI detection on a large, clinically relevant dataset. Embeddings derived from acoustic models, which capture both semantic and acoustic information, show promising performance and highlight the potential for developing a more scalable, noninvasive, and cost-effective early detection tool for ADRD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".