MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116797942 · doi:10.1186/s12939-025-02590-4

Unveiling the gendered dimensions of conflict-driven displacement: analyzing perceptions and attitudes toward gender-based violence among internally displaced persons in Burkina Faso

2025· article· en· W7116797942 on OpenAlexaff
Souleymane Bayoulou, Ibrahiman Touré, Kora KOUBATOU, Koutchango Afrima KPENGLAM, Sandra YOPA, Boris Arnaud, Kouomogne Nteungue, Gbètogo Maxime Kiki

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Equity in Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in RehabilitationUniversité Laval
FundersWorld Health Organization
KeywordsPerceptionSociocultural evolutionInternally displaced personDisplaced personSocial policyPoison controlPublic healthHuman factors and ergonomicsHealth services research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Burkina Faso has been dealing with a worsening security situation since 2015, resulting in more than two million people being forced to leave their homes. Gender-based violence (GBV) has escalated and is a major issue in situations involving conflict and forced displacement. This research examines the views and opinions of internally displaced individuals on VBG in Burkina Faso, specifically emphasizing how ingrained social structures contribute to this problem. METHODS: This study employed a qualitative, descriptive, and exploratory research design. The research was conducted in Kaya city, a region heavily impacted by displacement. Data were collected through 58 focus group discussions, which included 352 participants. The data were thematically analyzed using NVivo 12 and the approach developed by Braun and Clarke, enabling a thorough identification of key patterns and themes. RESULTS: Findings enabled the identification of several critical dimensions of GBV, its root causes, and risk factors. GBV was highlighted as deeply rooted in cultural and structural determinants, with gender inequality, power imbalances, and entrenched social constructs forming its primary foundations. Economic hardship, ignorance, behavioral issues like alcohol misuse, and institutional shortcomings were seen as contributors exacerbating GBV but not necessarily its root causes. Participants emphasized heightened GBV risks during humanitarian crises, manifesting in physical, sexual, and psychological violence linked to harmful traditional practices like female genital mutilation (FGM), forced marriages, and the sexual division of labor. Though harmful practices persist, divergent views on GBV trends emerged, with some reporting reductions due to shifting behaviors or constraints. Preventive efforts, such as awareness campaigns and local interventions, were noted but insufficient against sociocultural barriers to survivor support, including stigmatization and victim-blaming. CONCLUSIONS: This research elucidates the deep-rooted sociocultural and structural determinants of GBV, reflecting persisting gender inequities and systemic oppression. The findings underscore the pressing requirement for thorough communication plans that increase understanding of accessible services and foster participation despite the widespread stigma, shame, and fear that prevent individuals from seeking help.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.507
Teacher spread0.418 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Equity in HealthSame topicHydropower, Displacement, Environmental ImpactFrench-language works237,207