MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116830338 · doi:10.1002/alz70860_105692

Executive functions and language domains are vulnerable to Social Determinants of Health: A cognitive analysis from the PROMOTE trial

2025· article· en· W7116830338 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jordana Simoes Braga, Thaís Secchi, Danielle Aparecida Gomes Pereira, Francine Würzius Quadros, Aline Palmeira Pires, Magda Carla Ouriques Martins, Bruna Jaeger, Franciele Pereira dos Santos, Wyllians Vendramini Borelli, Sheila Martins

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusCognitionAffect (linguistics)Executive functionsPsychological interventionSocial determinants of healthSocial cognitive theoryHealth equity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDH) frame a complex interplay between environmental factors that increase the risk of many health conditions, including dementia. However, it is unclear whether SDH impairs cognitive domains differently. This study aimed to investigate the impact of SDH across distinct cognitive domains in a South American population, expanding current understanding predominantly based on European and North American cohorts. METHOD: Baseline data from the PROMOTE trial, conducted in a Brazilian cohort, was collected between 2023 and 2022. Participants were clinically evaluated and underwent the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), with scores divided into subscores for six cognitive domains: Memory Index Score (MIS), Executive Index Score (EIS), Attention Index Score (AIS), Language Index Score (LIS), Visuospatial Index Score (VIS), and Orientation Index Score (OIS). SDH variables included years of education, ethnicity, family income, and neighborhood income. Regression models were used to evaluate the impact of SDH on total MoCA scores and subscores, adjusted for age and sex. RESULT: Data from 147 participants (mean age: 59 years; mean years of education: 13.2) were analyzed. The majority of participants were White (n = 139), while 12 were non-White (Tab. 1). Total MOCA scores were not associated with any SDH. However, regression analysis revealed that SDH had distinct associations with MoCA subscores. Years of education were significantly associated with EIS (β = 0.11, p-adjusted = 0.002). Additionally, lower family income was significantly associated with EIS (β = -0.32, p = 0.04). For LIS, neighborhood income was significantly associated (β = 0.03, p = 0.04). In contrast, no significant associations were found between racial origin and MoCA subscores. CONCLUSION: SDH independently influences specific cognitive domains. Education and family income significantly impact the Executive Index, while neighborhood income affects the Language domain. These findings underscore the critical role of socioeconomic factors in cognitive health and the nuanced ways in which SDH affect distinct cognitive domains. Racial origin did not show a significant influence, emphasizing the importance of targeting socioeconomic interventions to address disparities in cognitive outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→