MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116847567 · doi:10.5287/ora-pdyzak5j7

Russia's escalating opposition to popular revolutions in the Post-Soviet region and Middle East: A quest for domestic legitimacy

2021· dissertation· en· W7116847567 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Samuel Ramani

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRussia and Soviet political economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOpposition (politics)Foreign policyAuthoritarianismPresidencyLegitimacyUnrestInternational relationsPublic opinionScholarship

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis attempts to explain the sources of Russia’s opposition to popular uprisings in the post-Soviet region and Middle East since the colour revolutions in Georgia (2003) and Ukraine (2004). Although Russia has experienced few major episodes of unrest in recent years, Moscow’s opposition to popular uprisings has escalated from rhetorical criticisms of the colour revolutions to its military interventions in Ukraine and Syria. This thesis argues that existing neoclassical realist, English School and constructivist arguments incompletely explain this phenomenon, and instead advances a novel theoretical approach called “instrumental constructivism.” This theory contends that Russia’s counter-revolutionary policy is an integral component of its foreign policy identity that crystallised in an incremental fashion. Soviet and transition-era framings of popular unrest conditioned the Russian public to associate mass protests with rampant disorder, and Western interference and expansionism. As Vladimir Putin’s presidency progressed, the Russian public also linked successful challenges to the Western-dominated liberal order to domestic perceptions of great power status. In order to align Russian foreign policy more closely with public opinion, Russian officials constructed a counter-revolutionary foreign policy identity, which exploited popular insecurities about mass protests and appealed to domestic status aspirations. To provide empirical evidence for instrumental constructivism’s key contentions, this thesis explores Russia’s responses to the colour revolutions and Arab Spring and uses Ukraine after the Euro-Maidan revolution and the Syrian civil war as its two primary case studies. The thesis concludes by assessing instrumental constructivism’s potential transferability to the foreign policy conduct of other authoritarian states, and to related dimensions of Russia’s global offensive against liberal democracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)Same topicRussia and Soviet political economyFrench-language works237,207