MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116855212 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106494

Safety of COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant individuals in Quebec, Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study from the Canadian Immunization Research Network

2025· article· en· W7116855212 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Marilou Kiely, Ella Diendéré, Isaora Dialahy, Gentiane Perrault-Sullivan, Nicholas Brousseau, Denis Talbot, Amélie Boutin, Caroline Quach, Sarah C J Jorgensen, Isabelle Boucoiran

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineOttawa Fertility CentreCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecUniversité de MontréalUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalHôtel-Dieu de Québec
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Immunization Research NetworkPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsRetrospective cohort studyVaccinationImmunizationPregnancyCohort studyPublic healthAdverse effectEpidemiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between maternal COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study using a hospitalisation database linked with other health administrative databases. SETTING: Province of Quebec, Canada, from 1 May 2021 to 30 June 2023. PARTICIPANTS: All singleton pregnancies resulting in a live birth or stillbirth at ≥20 weeks of gestation, excluding those with a conception date <42 weeks before the end of the study period. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We used robust Poisson regression models to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) for chorioamnionitis, postpartum haemorrhage, caesarean delivery, preterm birth, very preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), maternal and neonatal admission to intensive care unit (ICU, NICU) and severe neonatal morbidity. We used a Cox regression model with a time-varying exposure variable to estimate adjusted HRs (aHRs) for stillbirth. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for potential confounding. RESULTS: Among 140 073 singleton pregnancies resulting in live birth or stillbirth, 61 282 individuals (43.8%) received at least one dose of messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. Vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of chorioamnionitis (aRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.04), postpartum haemorrhage (aRR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.06), very preterm birth (aRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.21) and stillbirth (aHR 1.14, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.39). Vaccination during pregnancy was significantly associated with a reduced risk of caesarean delivery (aRR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.96), maternal ICU admission (aRR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.98), SGA (aRR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.98), NICU admission (aRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.96), preterm birth (aRR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.99) and severe neonatal morbidity (aRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Ongoing surveillance of the safety of maternal COVID-19 vaccination is essential as doses continue to be recommended for this group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ OpenSame topicCOVID-19 Impact on ReproductionFrench-language works237,207