MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116863797 · doi:10.64898/2025.12.19.695556

Pooled CRISPRi screening reveals fungal-specific vulnerabilities across environments and genetic backgrounds

2025· article· en· W7116863797 on OpenAlexafffund
Lauren Wensing, Philippe C Després, Desiree Francis, Meea Fogal, Anthony Hendriks, Nicholas C Gervais, Clara Fikry, Abdul-Rahman Adamu Bukari, Aleeza C. Gerstein, Christina A. Cuomo, Rebecca S. Shapiro

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Guelph
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsGeneGenomicsPsychological repressionPhenotypeGenetic screenGene regulatory networkExploitGenetic FitnessStrain (injury)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The rising rate of drug-resistant fungal infections and the emergence of fungal pathogens with intrinsic resistance phenotypes are a growing concern. The close evolutionary distance between mammals and fungi complicates the design of new antifungals and increases the chances of toxic off-target effects. As such, antifungal drug development usually focuses on fungal-specific proteins when considering potential new targets. Ideal drug targets should mediate essential cell processes and be highly sensitive to inhibition. Targeted gene repression can serve as a model for drug-mediated inhibition and for determining the dosage-sensitivity profile of genes of interest. In the fungal pathogen Candida albicans , classical approaches for gene repression can be labour-intensive and limited to one genetic background due to low throughput. Here, we adapt pooled CRISPRi screening in C. albicans for the first time and exploit this technique for large-scale functional genomic analysis. Through pooled CRISPRi screening, we test the repression sensitivity of over a hundred essential genes conserved in fungi but absent in humans, and successfully identify highly dosage-sensitive genes across multiple cell components and pathways. By extending our analysis to ten diverse environmental conditions, we show how the environment influences dosage-sensitivity profiles. Finally, we extend our experiments to two clinical drug-resistant C. albicans strain backgrounds and demonstrate that many of the fitness defects we observed are conserved in resistant clinical isolates. Together, our results highlight a set of genes that are highly dosage-sensitive across different genetic and environmental contexts, making them attractive targets for further investigation. By facilitating rapid, efficient large-scale functional genomics assays across diverse genetic backgrounds, CRISPRi pooled screening will open new frontiers in C. albicans biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering→French-language works237,207→