The AGED Phenotype: A vascular phenotype of cognitive impairment across diverse populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The AGED phenotype-Apathy, Gait Disturbance, and Executive Dysfunction-has been proposed as an early marker of vascular cognitive impairment. This study examines its prevalence and cross-ethnic validity, exploring associations with vascular risk factors and cognitive decline. Identifying syndromic markers such as AGED may improve early intervention strategies and risk stratification for cognitive aging, particularly in underrepresented populations. METHOD: Data were drawn from two discovery cohorts-the Daily Activity Study of Health (DASH; n = 37) and the Healthy Aging Brain Study (HABS; n = 52)-and externally validated in The Health & Aging Brain Study - Health Disparities (HABS-HD; n = 4,477). The HABS-HD cohort comprised African American (n = 737), Mexican American (n = 1,831), and Non-Hispanic White (n = 1,909) adults (Mean age=66.00, SD=8.4). The AGED phenotype was defined using apathy (GDS-3A), gait speed (4-meter test), and executive function (Trail Making Test B, TMT-B). K-means clustering (k=3) identified low, intermediate, and high-risk AGED phenotypes. Vascular risk factors-including blood pressure, diabetes, BMI, and cholesterol-were analyzed across clusters. Clustering stability was assessed via Jaccard Index, and principal component analysis (PCA) aided dimensionality reduction. RESULT: Three AGED clusters emerged in DASH and HABS, successfully replicated in HABS-HD: 1. Low-risk (50.1%)-faster gait (>1.0 m/s), preserved cognition, low apathy. 2. Intermediate-risk (34.8%)-moderate gait (0.8-1.0 m/s), mild executive dysfunction, moderate apathy. 3. High-risk (15.1%)-slow gait (<0.8 m/s), severe executive dysfunction, high apathy, linked to higher systolic BP (≥135 mmHg), diabetes, and cognitive impairment (TMT-B >200s). Prevalence of the high-risk AGED phenotype: • African Americans (17.3%)-higher BP (151.07 mmHg), greater executive dysfunction (TMT-B=244.45s). • Mexican Americans (21.6%)-highest prevalence, lower education (7.06 years), high diabetes (45.21%). • Non-Hispanic Whites (11.8%)-better gait (1.08 m/s) but higher hypertension (59.57%). Jaccard Index demonstrated high clustering stability (DASH=0.901, HABS=0.925, HABS-HD=0.915-0.940). CONCLUSION: The AGED phenotype represents a vascular variant of cognitive impairment, with higher prevalence in Mexican Americans and African Americans, supporting an ethnic risk gradient. External validation confirms its generalizability. Given its vascular associations, AGED may serve as a preclinical marker for early intervention in cognitive decline. Future studies should assess its predictive validity for dementia and targeted interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".