MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116877855 · doi:10.1002/alz70860_105084

BDNF Val66Met genotype, age at menopause, and physical activity synergistically influence cognition in postmenopausal women

2025· article· en· W7116877855 on OpenAlexaffabout
Madeline Wood Alexander, Jane Paterson, Walter Swardfager, Sandra E. Black, Jennifer S Rabin

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsOntario Brain InstituteSunnybrook Health Science CentreSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostmenopausal womenCognitionPhysical activityAssociation (psychology)MenopausePhysical exerciseCognitive decline

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Earlier age at menopause is a risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia. Carriers of the Met allele of the Val66Met polymorphism show decreased levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which is associated with worse cognitive outcomes. Previous research suggests that higher BDNF levels may help mitigate the cognitive deficits associated with estrogen depletion in postmenopausal women. Physical activity (PA) increases BDNF levels and might further counteract the effects of earlier menopause and/or Met allele carriage on cognitive outcomes. Despite these known associations, the combined influence of these factors remains unknown. Here, we investigated whether BDNF genotype, age at menopause, and PA interact to influence cognition in postmenopausal women. METHOD: We used baseline data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. BDNF Val66Met genotype was dichotomized as Met carriers (Met/Met or Met/Val) vs. non-carriers (Val/Val). Age at menopause was self-reported. PA was measured using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) score. Global cognition was assessed with neuropsychological tests and quantified with a composite of standardized scores. Linear regression models were used to test independent and interactive associations of age at menopause, Met carriage, and PASE score on cognitive scores, adjusting for age, years of education, and testing language (English/French). RESULTS: We included N = 8,101 postmenopausal women (mean age=64.5±8.78 years, mean age at menopause=50.0±4.86 years, 33% Met carriers). In terms of independent effects, earlier menopause and lower PA were each associated with worse cognition (age at menopause: β = 0.070, p < .001; PA: β = 0.033, p = .001). However, Met carriage alone was not associated with cognition (β = 0.005, p = .81). Notably, there was a significant three-way interaction between age at menopause, Met carriage, and PA on cognition. Specifically, greater PA levels attenuated the influence of earlier menopause on worse cognition in Met carriers, but not in non-carriers (Figure 1; β = -0.048, p = .03). Sensitivity analysis adjusting for hormone therapy and vascular risk yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that age at menopause, BDNF genotype, and PA synergistically influence cognition in postmenopausal women. Staying physically active may be particularly beneficial for cognitive health in women with the Met allele and an earlier age at menopause.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicNerve injury and regeneration→French-language works237,207→