Glutamate indicators with increased sensitivity and tailored deactivation rates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding how neurons integrate signals from thousands of input synapses requires methods to monitor neurotransmission across many sites simultaneously. The fluorescent protein glutamate indicator iGluSnFR enables visualization of synaptic signaling, but the sensitivity, scale and speed of such measurements are limited by existing variants. Here we developed two highly sensitive fourth-generation iGluSnFR variants with fast activation and tailored deactivation rates: iGluSnFR4f for tracking rapid dynamics, and iGluSnFR4s for recording from large populations of synapses. These indicators detect glutamate with high spatial specificity and single-vesicle sensitivity in vivo. We used them to record natural patterns of synaptic transmission across multiple experimental contexts in mice, including two-photon imaging in cortical layers 1-4 and hippocampal CA1, and photometry in the midbrain. The iGluSnFR4 variants extend the speed, sensitivity and scalability of glutamate imaging, enabling direct observation of information flow through neural networks in the intact brain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".